Chemical analysis of natural CO₂ rise over the last 50,000 years shows that today’s rate is 10 times faster (Phys)
‘Land squeeze’: New pressures emerging from carbon and biodiversity offset projects (Down to Earth)
Alarmed by Climate Change, Astronomers Train Their Sights on Earth (The New York Times)
As the Ocean Heats Up, Governments Should Prepare for Future Climate Changes (Pew Trust)
Today’s world: Fastest rate of carbon dioxide rise over the last 50,000 years (Science Daily)
German forests needed for climate action, but remain in poor condition – report (Clean Energy Wire)
Climate change threatens health in Europe: Urgent action needed to protect vulnerable populations (News Medical)
Sweltering heat across Asia was 45 times more likely because of climate change, study finds (AP News)
Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Is Increasing 10 Times Faster Than at Any Point in the Last 50,000 Years (Technology Networks)
The 1.5C global heating target was always a dream, but its demise doesn’t signal doom for climate action (The Guardian)
Traumatic Decarbonization in Fragile States (USIP)
Climate change is linked to worsening brain diseases – new study (The Conversation)
Economic damage from climate change six times worse than thought – report (The Guardian)
The fingerprints of climate change are all over a budget navigating an economy in transition (ABC)
Thunderstorms, Wind and Climate Change: Here’s What to Know (The New York Times)
Turning Climate Uncertainty Into Climate Action Through A Map (Forbes)
Climate Jobs Are Ramping Up, But a ‘Just Transition’ Is Necessary to Ensure Equity, Experts Say (Inside Climate News)
Climate change will knock one-third off world economy, study shows (The Globe and Mail)
CO2 increase is 10 times faster today than in the past 50,000 years (Earth)
Climate change impacts millions in India. But as the country votes, some politicians skirt the issue (AP News)
Pope Francis: “Climate change at this moment is a road to death” (CBS News)
How the Shipping Industry Is Trying to Cut Its Billion Tons of CO2 Emissions (Bloomberg)
Shipping’s Carbon Emissions: How Industry Aims to Reach Net Zero by 2050 (Bloomberg)
Green Shipping Could Launch Massive Jobs Boom (Maritime Executive)
The Race to Decarbonize Heavy Industry Heats Up (Inside Climate News)
DOE Seeks Input on Strategies to Decarbonize America’s Industrial Sector (Department of Energy)
‘Game changing’ green shipping corridors plotted for Irish Sea (Business Green)
How Carbon Markets Can Deliver to the Front Lines of the Climate Crisis (Time)
Decarbonization Running ‘Faster and Deeper’ than Expected, Transition Expert Says (The Energy Mix)
What US tariffs on Chinese batteries mean for decarbonization—and Taiwan (Atlantic Council)
Coca-Cola HBC: Circularity at the Heart of Sustainability (Sustainability Mag)
How Classification is Evolving to Support Innovation and Sustainability (Maritime Executive)
Green shipping to create four million jobs (Freight News)
Scan Global Logistics and Hapag-Lloyd forge biofuel partnership (Offshore Energy Biz)
Feature: US steelmakers, government investing in decarbonization but consumers reluctant to pay ‘green’ premium (S&P Global)
Eastern Shipbuilding Starts Next Phase of Infrastructure Expansion (Maritime Executive)
The world faces a shortage of minerals needed for the energy transition (CNN)
Wired for Change: AI, Energy, and the Decarbonization Dilemma (Carbon Credits)
Public-private action only way to decarbonization (The Asset)
A new sail design for cargo ships is propelling the maritime industry to a more sustainable future (Business Insider)
If budgets are the government’s attempt to chart the course for the next few years, what can this one teach us about how climate change is leaving its mark and how the government plans to tackle it?
The U.S. experienced a record 28 billion-dollar weather and climate disasters in 2023, part of a rising trend in disaster frequency and costs.
According to NOAA, in 2023, the U.S. government spent approximately $92.9 billion on natural disaster recovery. This figure is based on the cost of 28 separate billion-dollar weather and climate disasters that occurred throughout the year. These events included severe weather, flooding, tropical cyclones, tornadoes, a winter storm, a wildfire, and a significant drought and heatwave.
The increasing number and severity of such events highlight the escalating financial burden on federal disaster assistance programs, emphasizing the need for enhanced mitigation and adaptation strategies to manage future risks more effectively.
Nationwide, tropical cyclones are the most costly type of billion-dollar disaster, and severe storms are the most frequent. Each U.S. region faces a different set of disaster risks each season.
It’s difficult to measure precisely how much climate change has already impacted federal budgets globally, but some key figures provide insight. The most obvious indicator is the amount countries currently spend on disaster recovery payments.
Climate change and global climate action will profoundly impact the global economy, reshaping the mix of industries and requiring effective mitigation and adaptation to manage climate impacts.
The U.S. government is expected to spend significant amounts on natural disaster recovery in the coming years. For Fiscal Year 2024, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has estimated a requirement of approximately $19.47 billion for major disasters.
Additionally, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) highlights that the increasing frequency and severity of natural disasters are driving up the reliance on federal disaster assistance. Since 1980, weather and climate disasters have caused trillions of dollars in damage, necessitating a substantial federal response to support recovery efforts and build resilience (USGAO).
These projections underscore the escalating financial burden on the federal government to address the impacts of natural disasters, further emphasizing the need for effective mitigation and adaptation strategies.
Once confined to scientific publications, climate scenarios are now central to sustainability discussions across various industries, from investors to the energy and food & beverage sectors. Companies like Apple and Ben & Jerry’s use climate scenarios for risk management. These scenarios are increasingly used due to their inclusion in global accounting and sustainability disclosure standards, such as IFRS, adopted in 168 countries. Companies identifying climate change as a financial risk are now required to use climate-related scenario assessments.
Recently, the US Fed conducted a pilot climate scenario assessment with six major banks, revealing that a hurricane event in the US Northeast could impact 20-50% of their residential and commercial real estate loans. Given that the value of commercial real estate loans in the US was nearly $3000 billion in March 2024, this potential impact is significant.
Climate scenarios and forecasts are often used interchangeably, but they are distinct. The IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) emphasizes that climate scenarios are not forecasts; they are storylines of what the future could look like based on current knowledge, whereas forecasts are considered more likely outcomes.
Investors and companies in several countries are now encouraged to include climate scenarios in their sustainability disclosures. This practice was integrated into the IFRS standards, ensuring international comparability of financial and sustainability reporting. Businesses use these scenarios to assess risks and opportunities under different global warming scenarios, evaluating both physical and policy/technological risks.
However, there are limitations in how businesses use climate scenarios. Some companies use only one scenario, which contradicts the scientific view of multiple possible futures. For example, an analysis of companies reporting to the Carbon Disclosure Project revealed that about 14% use only a single scenario. Additionally, there is a need for more capacity building at the business level, as the skill is currently primarily found in large corporations.
Understanding and leveraging climate scenarios, combined with robust collaboration, can help better prepare for and mitigate the impacts of climate change, instilling confidence in our ability to handle climate uncertainties.
An analysis conducted by Deloitte shows that reaching net-zero emissions by 2050 requires urgent action, at roughly four times the speed of major historical transformations like the Industrial Revolution. Acting now to capture emissions is dramatically more effective than delaying; capturing 1 million metric tonnes per annum (mmtpa) of carbon by 2050 is equivalent to capturing only 0.35 mmtpa today. Despite a slowdown in the economy, global energy-related carbon dioxide emissions rose by 1.1% in 2023 compared to 2022, according to the International Energy Agency. Deloitte’s research highlights that each year of delay in reducing carbon emissions could result in as much as $150 billion in incremental costs.
Cross-sector collaboration and collective action are crucial for driving global impact and achieving net-zero emissions. Careful planning and coordination among industries are essential to realizing the highest impact in a relatively short timeframe.
Beatriz Canamary is a consultant in Sustainable and Resilient Business, Doctor and Professor in Business, Civil Engineer, specialized in Mergers and Acquisitions from the Harvard Business School, and mom of triplets. Today she is dedicated to the effective application of the UN Sustainable Development Goals in Multinationals.
She is an ESG enthusiast and makes it possible to carry out sustainable projects, such as energy transition and net-zero carbon emissions. She has +15 years of expertise in large infrastructure projects.
Member of the World Economic Forum, Academy of International Business and Academy of Economics and Finance.
